While I’m a
strong believer in the advantage of having size and strength as a hockey-player
I start to realise that the size-factor might be a bit overrated nowadays.
Zdeno Chara, the tallest NHL-player with 6.09 |
No
question: A skilled, fast, mobile, big and strong player is better than a
skilled, fast mobile, small player. But although the rule-changes a couple of
years ago worked basically a bit in the favor of skilled and quick players
there are still heavy doubts about smallish, skinny players. No matter how skilled
they are.
It’s time
to dig a bit deeper and try to find some facts and figures with the target to
rationalise this evergreen in scouting-discussions.
In a span
of 5 years before 2010 the NHL drafted 23 players with the small size of 5.09,
58 players with 5.10, 121 players with 5.11, 132 players with a size of 6feet,
130 with 6.01, 134 with 6.02, 70 with 6.03, 37 with 6.04 and 11 with 6.05. The
interesting question is now: How many players of each these categories did make
it to the NHL, means in my interpretation played at least 100 games in the NHL?
Nathan Gerbe, the smallest NHL-player with 5.05 |
The result
might surprise a lot of readers: There are no significant differencies between
these size-groups. 36% of the drafted 6.05 sized players appeared in more than
100 NHL-games as the „best“ size-group. The lowest percentage comes with 19%
and belongs to the 6.03 sized-players. The 2nd best group are the 6.04 sized
players with 32% and... surprise, surprise, the 3rd best size-group was the
5.09-players with 30%. Yes, the related amount of players are not big
enough to proof the thesis that the size-factor is overrated but at least these
numbers indicate that the size-factor is probably a bit overrated. Anyway: Thanks to hockeyfreak7 for these interesting numbers.
Personally
I’m a believer in skills, hockey-sense and personality as a priority if I’m thinking about a
top10-pick. In later rounds, if you e.g. try to find specific role-players, I start to weigh in the size- and strength factor more and more. Sometimes I
really believe that we scouts tend to overrate the size-factor because it’s a
fact and not a subjective asset and of course we love the facts and figures and
are sometimes not brave enough to raise our voice for a really skilled smallish
player. Does the name Sebastian Aho, the smallish but highly skilled and still
undrafted Skelleftea d-man ring a bell? Maybe I’m too optimistic about him,
maybe not?
Sebastian Aho, underrated because of the size-factor? |
No comments:
Post a Comment